The Visible Knife

By Loren Segal on July 21st, 2008 at 4:56 PM /

The Visible Knife

This is a photo taken using the Harris Shutter Effect, following up on my trichromy (a.k.a. technicolor) experimentation. The Harris Shutter effect is basically trichromy with one colour channel purposely changed to give a technicolor “artifact” or ghosting effect.

The colour effect here was achieved with 4 exposures of black and white (Ilford Pan F 50 Plus) film with separate RGB filters and a no-filter shot to compensate for the filter sharpness. Each shot was then superimposed (digitally in my case) in the respective R/G/B colour channel.

You can see this on my flickr account as well as my other trichromy photos by clicking the image.

The Clearing 1

By Loren Segal on July 20th, 2008 at 2:55 PM / , , ,

The Clearing 1

A photo I took on the waterfront right off of Montreal with fellow photographer and subject Emilie Olson.

Pimp My BIOS

By Loren Segal on May 09th, 2008 at 2:17 PM /

Has this ever happened to you?

Tesla. We need this now.

By Loren Segal on May 03rd, 2008 at 3:18 AM / , , , ,

The Tesla Roadster is an electric car and produces one-tenth the pollution of the best sports carI’ll be honest. I’m not much of an environmentalist. I don’t even take well to people who try to impose their belief of climate change theory by using a pathos-based argument about Al Gore’s climactic struggles to get people educated about his views on global warming based mostly on one obscurely discussed piece of evidence brought up only once in the entire film… but I digress.

The truth is, regardless of your views about the actual effect we’re having on the environment, it’s obvious that society is simply doing something wrong. It shouldn’t take "Who Killed the Electric Car" to make people realize that the way we continue to build vehicles is grossly inefficient. We should already know this. I didn’t, I’m guilty. However once you realize how silly our automotive industry is being, it’s really hard to sit silent… and a lot harder if you don’t live in California.

I’m probably being sort of cryptic to those who don’t know anything about Electric Vehicles, or EV’s. For those who don’t, the documentary above is a great (but biased) starting point about their short-lived history. They basically lived, and then died… and of course we blame corporate America (GM, specifically) for their abrupt death. Conspiracy theories aside, EV’s are an amazing idea. After watching that documentary and informing myself more about the pros and cons of electric cars, it became obvious that they have tremendous potential. Even more potential than Hydrogen vehicles, though I’ll admit, those are looking pretty good too. The problem is really that no one wants to make them.

This is History

Fortunately, however, there is a company by the name of Tesla Motors who decided a few years back to resurrect the EV. They were smart though (more on that later), which is probably the main reason they have so far been successful. As reported by the AP, they open their first store next week.

Stop and think about this for a second. What you are seeing is unprecedented in the automotive industry. You are currently witnessing the birth of a completely innocent, completely pure, automotive manufacturer. This is not a subsidiary of Ford, nor GM. They weren’t contracted by any multinational, or the ex-VPs of any car company at all. Heck, this may not even be a selling point, but these guys haven’t even made a car before in their lives. It’s actually amazing they’ve come this far to begin with.

Whatever Happened to Efficiency?

Now I could go on and on about the amazing steps they’ve overcome, the awesome car features, and why they did what they did, but I’d rather point out why this car is simply "done right"… and all I need for that is to illustrate it with one graph:

Motor Torque & Power Curve - Stolen from teslamotors.com

Bam. How obvious is that? To any engineer out there, isn’t this the most obvious head-smacker? Nothing illustrates the ridiculous inefficiency of an internal-combustion engine better than a graph like this. I mean, the torque of the conventional engine doesn’t even peak anywhere near the operating torque of the electric engine.

No Thinking Inside this Box.

To me, this really exemplifies the beauty of the electric motor, and really brings the point home.

Yea, everyone knows increasing MPG is a good thing, more mileage this, decreased emissions that. We’re all thinking in the same box there. What really sets this car (and the capability of all EV’s) apart here is the simple fact that efficiency is how you solve the problem. If you have a flawed design, you don’t try to pump more juice in it to make it more powerful. You don’t find ways to make it lighter, or use less energy to get similar power. You design a better system from the ground up. That’s how people in the automotive industry should be thinking. You don’t stick to ridiculously dirty, hard to maintain catalytic converters just because you’ve been using them for decades. That’s not engineering. Engineering is about using the best tool for the job. Now look at the graph above again, which tool looks better to you?

Frankly, no car company could have done this. GM, Ford, et. al have had their heads stuck under the hood for so long they don’t even know what box they’re thinking in, let alone what the outside looks like.

Save the Comments, I Know It’s not Perfect.

It’s obvious this car comes with its share of problems. Electric power doesn’t get you across the country (YET), and the distance a car like this won’t be making any vacation-type road travelers all too happy. But there is huge potential here. There is tremendous room for improvement. They just got started. And if their work is adopted rather than pushed away, it will only get better. Most importantly, we need this. If not for the environment, for the peace of mind knowing the improvement of transport technology is about improving transport, not how many seating arrangements we can achieve.

Thanks Heba!

By Loren Segal on April 07th, 2008 at 1:31 AM / , , ,

kaki

Now people know the truth about how I made her famous. For more, read the about in this Youtube video that started it all

It’s also important to notes that Kaki King still owes me a kiss.

Tesla Coil Party & Facebook Needs UI Classes

By Loren Segal on March 29th, 2008 at 5:06 PM / , ,

tesla-coil-suit-1This is not the first time I feel completely lost in Facebook’s UI. Today I was trying to quickly make an event for a party I was going to have (fictional or not isn’t the point), and I spent at least 4 freakin’ minutes trying to find out where the hell you click to make an Event in facebook. That shouldn’t happen. It turns out, I removed the application from my applications list a long time ago because it completely clutters my list (how many times do people people like me make events anyway?).

But wait a minute, "Events" isn’t your every day application. In fact, it’s not an "application" at all. It’s an inherent feature in Facebook as proven by the fact that I can still do this:

Watch me create a million events without the ability to view them

Should I really be able to "delete" an "application" and still be able to use it? The only thing it deletes is my ability to navigate to it, and it doesn’t help that the only way to add it back is hidden within their application search page.

If you give the ability to remove links to basic functionality of a website, it should be assumed that there are other ways to access it. Otherwise it would be like removing the "Recycling Bin" (under Windows) from your desktop and no longer being able to ever see what you deleted ever again. Obviously there are secondary navigation paths in your Operating System’s UI– why is this not true for Facebook? This wouldn’t be so bad if I didn’t always run into these problems while attempting to navigate Facebook’s.. questionable.. UI.

Rant aside, I figured out how to create the event, so you’re all invited to my imaginary Tesla Coil party, which starts in 2 hours. BYOTC.

Servalopolis

By Loren Segal on March 25th, 2008 at 1:43 AM / , ,

On a sidenote, I think Moore's law also applies to the size of chains.

Only People Who Use mm/dd/yyyy Will Understand This

By Loren Segal on March 14th, 2008 at 5:34 PM / , ,

The pirate booty probably wasn't bad either.

* If you live outside the red, you may not get this joke
* Matt just got served

I Miss Spam

By Loren Segal on March 14th, 2008 at 1:30 AM / ,

I recently installed spamd on my server to do grey-list blocking which has so far gotten rid of 95% of my daily spam (used to be over 100 messages a day) and has so far lost 0 emails. After reading the following spam I got from another mode of communication I realized why it took me so long to block my spam… I love reading it.

My name is Juliet Kumassi, 21 year old girl and the only daughter of Late MR WILSON KUMASSI. My father was a very wealthy cocoa and gold merchant based in Accra (Ghana) and Abidjan (Ivory Coast) respectively. My parents were involved in a gastric motor accident last two years on their way coming back from my uncle’s residence.

Gastric. Someone needs to write me a spam filter that lets the good stuff through.

IE8 Beta, Ugh.

By Loren Segal on March 10th, 2008 at 2:04 PM / , , , , , , , ,

I’m usually a fan of IE (What, did someone just admit to that??), in fact, my primary browser on my Windows machine is not Firefox, but IE7, which I’ve used and has perfectly suited my needs since the first beta. Actually, I liked the first beta a lot more than the final release, so when I found out that Microsoft released beta 1 for IE8 I immediately went to download it. In retrospect, I should have did a little research first (there’s actually little information on IE8 right now), maybe I would have found out that:

  1. IE8 completely overwrites IE7 just like IE7 did with IE6. At least this time you can roll back, but you’d figure by now they’d have learned the simple software development principle of allowing applications to co-exist on a system. This is especially necessary when developers need to switch back and forth to compare and contrast behaviour.
  2. IE8 replaces the very simple concept described in (1) with an "IE7 emulation" mode. Unfortunately, "IE7 emulation" mode only emulates browser rendering, not the horrible UI issues. In addition to that, switching between IE7 emulation mode requires the browser (and all other windows!) to be completely restarted. Now all developers need to do to see changes in behaviour is:
    1. Navigate to their website in IE7 emulation mode
    2. Switch IE7 emulation mode off
    3. Close the browser
    4. Open the browser
    5. Navigate to the website again
    6. Check & attempt to solve differences
    7. Switch IE7 emulation mode back on
    8. Close the browser
    9. Open the browser
    10. Navigate to the website again
    11. Make sure your solution didn’t break IE7

    And don’t even try to view them side by side– no, that would be too easy. What a great idea, Microsoft.

  3. IE8 introduces the concept of "Activities" and "Slices". It lets you highlight text and perform a bunch of common tasks like searching (on Live) and mapping (on Live) by right clicking. Now I know this is Microsoft, but where the hell is Google Maps? You know, that better mapping website that pre-dates yours? These features are nice in theory, but everything here is so monopolistically targetted to their services only– meaning normal people get nothing out of it. Hopefully they add normal sites by the final release. Usually I would wait until the final to whine about third party functionality, but for some reason I don’t see this ever working with anything I actually use. And no, a Facebook search activity does not count.
  4. IE8 "standards" completely break even the most basic of pages. I’m talking oldschool tabular layouts, and the part that broke was the layout. How do you break that stuff?
  5. The horizontal scrollbar bar shows up on almost every single page. How the hell did a dead obvious bug like that get all the way to the beta?
  6. Why do domain names show up in bold in the address bar and the rest of the equally important URL is grayed out? Since when is the only important part of a URL the domain name? I’m not even sure what the UI purpose of that is…
  7. How do I disable Activities & Slices? I don’t want to see useless information in my popup menu and an even more useless popup button whenever I highlight text. I’ll assume it’s buried somewhere in the options… I see they’ve done no work to improve the horrible preferences dialog.

I’m not even going to talk about the standards (besides #4). The web development community has sufficiently hated on IE’s implementation of standards and there’s nothing left to say. I don’t necessarily share those opinions, but I also don’t care. When a non-developer visits your website they don’t care that you correctly implemented the CSS2.1 spec or that your XHTML validates and you have a graphic to prove it– they just want it to look normal. The second normal sites stop looking normal (#4) is when you’ve messed up and need to fix it.

All in all I’m pretty disappointed. Remember, I’m an IE user, and just listen to how pissed I sound. Needless to say I used the benefit of the rollback to IE7.

This beta makes me want to start using Safari or something. Don’t people make browsers to download and render webpages anymore? I don’t need Activities, I don’t need Slices, I don’t need Download Managers or Favourite Tagging Blogosphere Viewing Youtube Integration. I don’t even need tabs! Just render my damn HTML.

Newer Posts »